ArticleGlobalization and health2025
Evaluation of integration in WHO's tuberculosis, HIV, and antimicrobial resistance policies through the social-ecological lens.
Article in Globalization and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Community-engaged clinical governance and machine learning for optimizing tuberculosis management in rural Eastern Cape.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTB, HIV, and AMR are closely related global health challenges. In the context of limited global health funds and insufficient resources, an integrated tuberculosis, HIV and antimicrobial resistance prevention and control method will play an important role in the optimization of resources and cost-effectiveness.
objectiveThis study aims to analyze the degree of policy integration for issues of tuberculosis, HIV and antimicrobial resistance in global health strategies and make recommendations for improving global health governance on related issues.
methodsWe conducted a thorough analysis of global health policy documents from January 2015 to February 2024, using both quantitative and qualitative approaches. Our focus was on assessing the integration effectiveness of current global health governance mechanisms in addressing tuberculosis, HIV, and antimicrobial resistance from the global governance view based on the content analysis through word frequency analysis and thematic framework analysis. Besides, we conduct a thematic framework analysis of the action plans and policy recommendations outlined in the most recent reports from UNAIDS, Stop TB, and UNEP on HIV, TB and AMR.
resultsThe analysis revealed that most documents address TB, HIV, and AMR in isolation, with limited integration and intersectionality. TB and HIV are more frequently linked, while AMR is less associated with the other two. The proposed action lacks specific provisions for joint implementation or monitoring of the evaluation. Additionally, no documented comprehensive overview includes the overall framework of three health priorities.
conclusionsThe study found that the current global health governance mechanism is significantly inadequate in dealing with integration solutions among tuberculosis, HIV and antimicrobial resistance. So we propose establishing integrated governance and coordination mechanisms for the same population at both horizontal and vertical levels, including individual, interpersonal, community, institutional, and societal levels, and developing an integrated policy framework to facilitate better resolution to address the association between TB, HIV infection and antimicrobial resistance in a resource-limited context. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.