ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
High-throughput biomedical relation extraction for semi-structured web articles empowered by large language models.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of Large Language Models in Colorectal Cancer Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Decision-Making: A Retrospective Single-Center Comparison of Guideline-Integrated General-Purpose vs. Domain-Specialized Models.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Use of Automation Technologies and Data Mining in Speech Recognition for Autism.Brain and behavior · 2026Review
- A review for navigating the trade-offs: evaluating open-source and proprietary large language models for clinical and biomedical information extraction.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Large Language Model-Driven Knowledge Graph Construction in Sepsis Care Using Multicenter Clinical Databases: Development and Usability Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe aim to develop a high-throughput biomedical relation extraction system tailored for semi-structured biomedical websites, leveraging the reading comprehension abilities and domain-specific medical knowledge of large language models (LLMs).
methodsWe formulate relation extraction as a series of binary classification problems. Given the context from semi-structured biomedical web articles, LLMs decide whether a relation holds while providing accompanying rationales for factual verification. The article's main title is designated as the tail entity, and candidate head entities are identified by matching against a biomedical thesaurus with semantic typing to guide candidate relation types. To assess system performance and robustness, we compare general-purpose, domain-adapted, and parameter-efficient LLMs on an expert-curated benchmark, evaluating their relative effectiveness in extracting relations from semi-structured biomedical websites.
resultsDomain-adapted models consistently outperform their general-purpose counterparts. Specifically, MedGemma-27B achieves an F1 score of 0.820 and Cohen's Kappa of 0.677, representing clear improvements over its base model Gemma3-27B (F1 = 0.771, Kappa = 0.604). Notably, MedGemma-27B also surpasses OpenAI's GPT-4o (F1 = 0.708, Kappa = 0.561) and GPT-4.1 (F1 = 0.732, Kappa = 0.597), demonstrating the advantage of biomedical domain adaptation even over stronger proprietary models. Among all evaluated models, DeepSeek-V3 yields the best overall performance (F1 = 0.844, Kappa = 0.730). Using MedGemma-27B, we extracted 225,799 relation triplets across three relation types from three authoritative biomedical websites. Case studies further highlight both the strengths and persistent challenges of different LLM classes in biomedical relation extraction from semi-structured content.
conclusionOur study demonstrates that LLMs can serve as effective engines for high-throughput biomedical relation extraction, with domain-adapted and parameter-efficient models offering practical advantages. The framework is scalable and broadly adaptable, enabling efficient extraction of diverse biomedical relations across heterogeneous semi-structured websites. Beyond technical performance, the ability to extract reliable biomedical relations at scale can directly benefit clinical applications, such as enriching biomedical knowledge graphs, supporting evidence-based guideline development, and ultimately assisting clinicians in accessing structured medical knowledge for decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.