Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41024068›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2025

Trauma inquiry and response in sexual and reproductive health settings: collaborative learning among clinicians.

Megha Shankar, Kelsey B Loeliger, Emily Ager, Maud Arnal, Sara Johnson, Zoe Matticks, Emily Nakamura, Hannah Begna, Eleanor Bimla Schwarz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Megha ShankarDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA. meshankar@health.ucsd.edu.
Kelsey B LoeligerDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Complex Family Planning, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Emily AgerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Maud ArnalDepartment of Sociology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Sara JohnsonLa Clinica de La Raza, Oakland, CA, USA.
Zoe MatticksSchool of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Emily NakamuraSchool of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Hannah BegnaDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Eleanor Bimla SchwarzDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

The Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation 10542UCLA/UCSF ACEs Aware Family Resilience Network #21-10317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrauma impacts sexual and reproductive health. Trauma inquiry is an opportunity for clinicians to identify and respond to trauma histories. The Trauma and Resilience-informed Inquiry for Adversity, Distress, and Strengths (TRIADS) framework could be relevant to sexual and reproductive health clinicians. The objectives of this study were to: (1) explore application of the TRIADS framework to sexual and reproductive health, (2) develop and evaluate a TRIADS-based training for sexual and reproductive health clinicians, and (3) identify practices in trauma inquiry and response in sexual and reproductive health settings.

methodsA narrative literature review informed the development of trainings (a webinar and collaborative learning groups) on applying TRIADS to sexual and reproductive health. Training participants completed an online survey of implementation outcomes. We used Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank tests to compare self-reported comfort with trauma screening and response before, immediately after, and four months after the training. Collaborative learning groups were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed based on a deductive approach.

resultsAmong 117 webinar participants who completed the post-webinar survey, 90% were “likely” or “very likely” to use TRIADS in their clinical practice. Among the 15 collaborative learning group participants, few (13%) reported previous formal training on trauma inquiry or response. Most (80–93%) cared for patients with risk factors for trauma, including substance use, unstable housing, and intimate partner violence. After the collaborative learning group, participants’ comfort with responding to patients’ trauma disclosure, applying the TRIADS framework, and performing a trauma-informed pelvic exam increased. Collaborative learning group participants reported increased resilience and decreased burnout since participation. The following themes emerged from qualitative analysis: Inquiring about Adversity (e.g., building trust before trauma inquiry), Assessing Distress (e.g., practicing trauma-informed pelvic exam), and Identifying Strengths (e.g., promoting reproductive empowerment). Participants reported time and burnout as major barriers to trauma inquiry in sexual and reproductive healthcare.

conclusionsThis study found a meaningful impact of applying the TRIADS framework to sexual and reproductive healthcare. Participation in the webinar and collaborative learning groups demonstrated increased comfort in trauma inquiry and decreased burnout over time. Clinician training in trauma inquiry in sexual and reproductive health settings may benefit both patients and clinicians.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelReproductive HealthSexual HealthAdultCooperative BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleClinician burnoutSexual and reproductive healthTrauma-informed careTrauma inquiry

Identifiers

PMID41024068
PMCPMC12481804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.