ArticleBMC public health2025
How can timeliness and accuracy be balanced? The surveillance information reporting mechanism for public health emergencies based on the online direct reporting system.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Driving Revisit Intentions Through Medical Information and Service Quality in General Hospitals: An Extended Technology Acceptance Model Approach.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBased on the failure of surveillance for COVID-19, this research focuses on the surveillance information reporting for public health emergencies under the online direct reporting system, exploring how to improve the timeliness and accuracy of public health emergencies surveillance through the effective combination of technical advantages with management mechanism.
methodsWe construct an evolutionary game model of surveillance information reporting for public health emergencies based on the local government, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCP) and medical institution, using numerical simulation to simulate the operating status of the game system and summarize the key factors to improve the effectiveness of public health emergencies surveillance.
resultsThe results indicate that medical institution’s ability to surveillance information management, the capabilities of CDCP to risk assessment, the degree of cooperation between CDCP and medical institution, the degree of collaborative linkage between the local government and CDCP, and the coverage of surveillance information have the greatest impacts on the subjects’ strategies, which in turn affects whether abnormalities can be timely and accurately reported. The enthusiasm of medical institution and CDCP to participate in surveillance information reporting is positively related to their own capabilities, but improving one party’s capabilities will reduce the enthusiasm of the other party. Strengthening the cooperation between CDCP and medical institution helps them choose positive strategies, and the collaborative linkage between CDCP and the local government helps the system eventually reach stability with the strategy combination of (1, 1, 1). Expanding the coverage of surveillance information provides convenience for CDCP and the government, but also causes medical institution reduce the speed of converging on positive management.
conclusionsThe development of technological advantages requires a management system as a guarantee. First, improving the professional capabilities of medical institution and CDCP is a prerequisite for carrying out public health emergencies surveillance. Second, CDCP should pay attention to communicating with the local government and medical institution, achieving vertical information sharing among subjects. Furthermore, the local government should horizontally expand the information sources to ensure the information in the online direct reporting system is true and accurate.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.