ArticleCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2025
Disease-specific distress healthcare financing and catastrophic out-of-pocket expenditure for hospitalization care in Bangladesh.
Article in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOut-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure is one of the most common payment strategies for hospitalization care in Bangladesh, and the share of OOP expenditure has been increasing at an alarming rate. This study aimed to investigate the OOP costs of hospitalization care, the impact of OOP on catastrophic healthcare expenditure (CHE) and financial distress, and the associated factors.
methodsWe used data from the most recent nationally representative dataset, the Bangladesh Household Income and Expenditure Survey 2022. A total of 14,395 households were surveyed, with 1973 household members hospitalized due to various illnesses. Respondents were asked to provide information regarding hospitalization care for the year preceding the survey. Households were considered to have CHE if they spent at least 25% of their total consumption expenditure or 40% of their non-food consumption expenditure on healthcare. Distress financing was defined as covering OOP healthcare costs by selling assets, borrowing money, or receiving financial assistance from friends or relatives. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify the determinants of CHE and distress financing.
resultsThe annual average OOP cost of hospitalization was USD 418, with the OOP cost nearly twice as high in private facilities compared to public ones (USD 538 vs. USD 283). The highest OOP costs were observed for cancer treatment (USD 2365), followed by COVID-19 (USD 1391). Overall, 6.72% and 9.03% of hospitalized patients experienced CHE at 25% of total expenditure and 40% of non-food expenditure, respectively, while about 61% of patients faced distress financing due to hospitalization.
conclusionFinancial hardship due to hospitalization remains high in Bangladesh. These findings will help policymakers adopt more effective healthcare financing strategies and improve the efficiency of public health investments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.