Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41023980›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Variation in healthcare services utilization and continuity of care in long-term care facilities: a cross-sectional study.

Johannes Schwabe, Brian W Pulling, Gillian E Caughey, Maria Crotty, Helena Williams, Andrew Kellie, David Roder, Krystal-Lee Nixon, Gillian Harvey, Janet K Sluggett and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Johannes Schwabe *Registry of Senior Australians Research Centre, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Terrace, Box PO 11060, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia. johannes.schwabe@sahmri.com.
Brian W Pulling *Registry of Senior Australians Research Centre, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Terrace, Box PO 11060, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
Gillian E CaugheyRegistry of Senior Australians Research Centre, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Terrace, Box PO 11060, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
Maria CrottyCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Helena WilliamsSilver Chain Group, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Andrew KellieEast Adelaide Healthcare, Newton, South Australia, Australia.
David RoderUniSA Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Krystal-Lee NixonSA Health Dental Service, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Gillian HarveyCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
Janet K SluggettRegistry of Senior Australians Research Centre, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Terrace, Box PO 11060, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
Monica CationsCollege of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
Tiffany K GillRegistry of Senior Australians Research Centre, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Terrace, Box PO 11060, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
Jyoti KhadkaRegistry of Senior Australians Research Centre, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Terrace, Box PO 11060, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
Megan CorlisAustralian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (SA Branch), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Marilyn von ThienRegistry of Senior Australians Research Centre, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Terrace, Box PO 11060, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
Maria C InacioRegistry of Senior Australians Research Centre, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Terrace, Box PO 11060, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.

Funding

Hospital Research Foundation MCF-27-2019Medical Research Future Fund MRFF1200056National Health and Medical Research Council GNT119378National Health and Medical Research Council GNT2016277
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary and specialist healthcare services are critical to ensuring high-quality care for people living in long-term residential aged care facilities (LTCFs). In Australia, these government-subsidized services include general practitioner attendances, health assessments, management plans, allied health services, pain medicine specialists, and mental healthcare, among others. Although the utilization of these services is known to be suboptimal, the extent and nature of variation in their use across LTCFs nationally remain unknown. Importantly, variation that is not attributable to resident needs or planned system design-termed unwarranted variation-has been shown to negatively impact health outcomes and warrants investigation. To address this gap, this population-based study aims to examine the national variation in primary and selected specialist healthcare services utilization and continuity of care in residential aged care facilities and characteristics of facility utilization outliers.

methodsA national cross-sectional study of 173,275 non-Indigenous residents aged ≥65 years from 2,744 Australian facilities in 2019 was conducted. To evaluate continuity of care, the cohort was restricted to LTCF residents who entered care in 2019 and were alive for at least six months (N = 41,654 individuals in 2,680 LTCFs). Adjusted median service and continuity of care utilization per 100 residents were calculated. National variation in the rate of healthcare service utilization was quantified using inlier-ranges, categorized as minimal = 0, low < 20, moderate = 20-79, high = 80-99, and maximal = 100.

resultsMaximal variation for services with moderate utilization (median = 22.1-60.6/100 residents) was observed for after-hours attendances, urgent after-hours attendances, health assessments, management plans, podiatry, and optometric services. Continuity of care had low-to-moderate utilization (median = 13.4-26.6/100) and moderate-to-high variation (inlier-range = 68-95.5). Some services had high (median = 99.9/100, general attendances) or low (median < 8.2/100, specialist attendances) utilization and low-to-moderate variation. A small number of mostly high-utilization outliers were identified.

conclusionsThere is substantial variation in utilization of healthcare services and continuity of care amongst residential aged care facilities nationally. While some facilities deliver high levels of preventive and disease management healthcare services supporting residents to have high continuity of care, many facilities face challenges facilitating access to adequate healthcare for their residents.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareHomes for the AgedLong-Term CarePatient Acceptance of Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleContinuity of patient careGeneral practiceHealth services for the agedLong-term carePrimary healthcare

Identifiers

PMID41023980
PMCPMC12482496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.