ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Comprehensive survival analysis of breast cancer patients: a bayesian network approach.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer is recognized as one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths globally. A deeper understanding of the complex interactions between clinical, pathological, and treatment-related factors is essential for improving patient outcomes.
methodsFollowing comprehensive data cleaning and preprocessing, an analysis was performed on a cohort of 1,980 primary breast cancer samples from the METABRIC database. The dataset was divided into a 75/25 training-testing split, and five-fold cross-validation was applied to the training set to mitigate overfitting. Overall and relapse-free survival were then modeled using four fully parametric distributions: Weibull, Exponential, Log-Normal, and Log-Logistic, along with their corresponding Accelerated Failure Time (AFT) forms, to identify significant prognostic features. Competing models were ranked by the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and further validated through Quantile-Quantile (QQ) plots. Finally, the probabilistic relationships among the significant factors selected by the optimal AFT models were explored using a Bayesian Belief Network (BBN), whose structure was learned from the training data using multiple score-based algorithms and refined through expert-driven judgment; all conditional probability parameters were estimated using maximum likelihood.
resultsThe Weibull model provided the best fit for overall survival, whereas the Log-Normal form was optimal for relapse-free survival, each satisfying their respective error-distribution diagnostics. In the hold-out test set, the Bayesian network achieved an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.880 and an F1-score of 0.779. Age at diagnosis, menopausal status, tumor stage, lymph-node burden, and treatment modality were identified as the most influential predictors, and the learned network clarified their direct and mediated effects on both survival endpoints.
conclusionThrough the integration of validated parametric survival models with a data-driven BBN, this study delivers a comprehensive framework for estimating individualized survival probabilities and visualizing the complex probabilistic relationships that characterize high-risk cancer patient profiles. This approach supports evidence-based, personalized breast cancer management and demonstrates the potential for guiding clinical decision-making and adapting to diverse external patient cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.