Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41023970›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2025

Robot-assisted ureteral reimplantation using the KangDuo surgical Robot-01 system: a prospective, single-center, single-arm pilot study.

Guanpeng Han, Liqing Xu, Zhihua Li, Shubo Fan, Shengwei Xiong, Xiang Wang, Yiwei Huang, Guoli Wang, Xiaofei Dai, Liang Cui and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Guanpeng Han *Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, 100034, Beijing, China.
Liqing Xu *Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, 100034, Beijing, China.
Zhihua Li *Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, 100034, Beijing, China.
Shubo FanDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, 100034, Beijing, China.
Shengwei XiongDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, 100034, Beijing, China.
Xiang WangDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, 100034, Beijing, China.
Yiwei HuangDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, 100034, Beijing, China.
Guoli WangDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, 100034, Beijing, China.
Xiaofei DaiDepartment of Urology, Civil Aviation General Hospital, Civil Aviation Medical College of Peking University, No. 76 Chaoyang Rd, Chaoyang District, 100123, Beijing, China.
Liang CuiDepartment of Urology, Civil Aviation General Hospital, Civil Aviation Medical College of Peking University, No. 76 Chaoyang Rd, Chaoyang District, 100123, Beijing, China.
Kunlin YangDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, 100034, Beijing, China.
Liqun ZhouDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, 100034, Beijing, China.
Yicong DuDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, 100034, Beijing, China. isy_nova@126.com.
Xuesong LiDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, 100034, Beijing, China. pineneedle@sina.com.

Funding

Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research 2024-1-4072National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFC2413400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUreteral reimplantation plays a crucial role in distal ureteral reconstruction, and the integration of robotic systems has greatly enhanced minimally invasive surgical techniques. This pilot study aims to evaluate the technically feasibility and safety of the newly developed KangDuo Surgical Robot-01 (KD-SR-01) system in performing robot-assisted ureteral reimplantation.

methodsThis prospective, single-center, single-arm pilot study was conducted from February 2022 to June 2024. Thirty-one ureteral reimplantation procedures were performed using the KD-SR-01 system. We collected the patients' characteristics, perioperative data and follow-up findings prospectively. We used the NASA-TLX (National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index) to assess ergonomics.

resultsAll 31 procedures were completed successfully without conversion. The median operative time was 153 min (IQR, 136-178.5 min). The median estimated blood loss was 20 mL (IQR, 15-35 mL). No patients needed blood transfusions during the operation. No severe complications occurred either intraoperatively or postoperatively. The median postoperative hospital stay was 4 days (IQR, 4-4 days). At a median follow-up of 22 months (IQR, 13-35 months), the subjective success rate was 96.8% (95% confidence interval: 83.3-99.9%). The surgeon indicated a high level of comfort, with a NASA-TLX global score of 9.47 ± 4.97.

conclusionsThe KD-SR-01 system is technically feasible and safe for robot-assisted ureteral reimplantation.

trial registrationThis study was registered at www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2200056553) on February 7, 2022.

Indexed as

ReplantationRobotic Surgical ProceduresUreterUrologic Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePilot ProjectsProspective StudiesReimplantationRoboticsRobotic surgical proceduresUreteral obstruction

Identifiers

PMID41023970
PMCPMC12482228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.