ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Automating the extraction of otology symptoms from clinic letters: a methodological study using natural language processing.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Expanding Role of Artificial Intelligence in Companion Animal Care: A Systematic Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMost healthcare data is in an unstructured format that requires processing to make it usable for research. Generally, this is done manually, which is both time-consuming and poorly scalable. Natural language processing (NLP) using machine learning offers a method to automate data extraction. In this paper we describe the development of a set of NLP models to extract and contextualise otology symptoms from free text documents.
methodsA dataset of 1,148 otology clinic letters written between 2009 - 2011, from a London NHS hospital, were manually annotated and used to train a hybrid dictionary and machine learning NLP model to identify six key otological symptoms: hearing loss, impairment of balance, otalgia, otorrhoea, tinnitus and vertigo. Subsequently, a set of Bidirectional-Long-Short-Term-Memory (Bi-LSTM) models were trained to extract contextual information for each symptom, for example, defining the laterality of the ear affected.
resultsThere were 1,197 symptom annotations and 2,861 contextual annotations with 24% of patients presenting with hearing loss. The symptom extraction model achieved a macro F1 score of 0.73. The Bi-LSTM models achieved a mean macro F1 score of 0.69 for the contextualisation tasks.
conclusionNLP models for symptom extraction and contextualisation were successfully created and shown to perform well on real life data. Refinement is needed to produce models that can run without manual review. Downstream applications for these models include deep semantic searching in electronic health records, cohort identification for clinical trials and facilitating research into hearing loss phenotypes. Further testing of the external validity of the developed models is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.