ArticleBMC palliative care2025
Perspectives, attitudes and experiences of introducing noninvasive medical technologies in end-of-life care: a scoping review.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is a strong tradition for withdrawing medical equipment from patients receiving end-of-life (EOL) care. However, the introduction of new noninvasive medical equipment could be acceptable provided that it improves the quality of care and patient comfort.
objectivesWe aimed to systematically map published studies of the perspectives, attitudes and experiences of health care professionals, dying patients, and their next of kin, about introducing noninvasive medical technology in end-of-life care.
designWe conducted a scoping review. On January 27, 2025, systematic searches of five databases were carried out (Medline (EBSCO), CINAHL, Embase, Academic Search Elite, and Cochrane Library CDSR). Inclusion criteria were empirical studies published in English or Scandinavian languages. We searched for qualitative, quantitative or mixed method studies focusing on perspectives on, experiences of and attitudes toward introducing noninvasive medical technologies in end-of-life care from the view of health care professionals, dying patients, and their next of kin. Three pairs of researchers independently assessed potential eligibility and data extraction. Data would be summarized qualitatively.
resultsThe searches yielded 3288 unique articles, 3194 of which were excluded following an initial screening. Among the remaining 94 articles, none satisfied our inclusion criteria. Thus, we found no empirical articles addressing perspectives on, attitudes toward, or experiences with the use of noninvasive medical technology in end-of-life care.
conclusionsEmpirical research exploring the perspectives on, attitudes toward, and experiences of, and use of noninvasive medical technology in end-of-life care is needed. This is important for understanding when and how it is feasible, useful, and ethical to introduce such technologies in the terminal phase of palliative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.