ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Changes in service use and unmet needs in home- and community- based services in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rural-Urban Variability in Home and Community-Based Service Use Among Veterans.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Article
- Consumer-reported quality indicators for publicly funded home- and community-based services: development and validation.The Gerontologist · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMore than 4 million older adults in the United States use publicly funded home-and community-based services (HCBS) which were disrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic. There is paucity of empirical evidence of how service disruptions influenced consumer needs in different types of HCBS. Therefore, we evaluate changes in service use and consumer-reported unmet service needs in HCBS during the COVID-19 pandemic (2021-2022) versus pre-pandemic (2018-2019), to inform future public health emergency (PHE) preparedness.
methodsWe analyzed repeated cross-sectional survey data from the National Core Indicators- Aging and Disability Adult Consumer Survey in two survey waves, 2018-2019 and 2021-2022. We included community-dwelling, older HCBS consumers (age ≥ 65 years; n = 7143) from 11 states that participated in both survey waves. We measured service use and consumer-reported unmet needs as outcomes for six commonly used HCBS including personal care, homemaker, meal delivery, adult day, transportation, and caregiver respite/support. Using logistic regression, we calculated adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) to evaluate changes in outcomes during versus pre-pandemic, adjusting for demographics, health-related variables, and self- versus proxy-response, with random intercepts for each state.
resultsCompared to 2018-2019, during 2021-2022, odds of service use increased for personal care (aOR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.09, 1.40) and caregiver respite/support (aOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.00, 1.63) but decreased for homemaker services (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.60, 0.79) and meal delivery (aOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70, 0.93). During the PHE, odds of unmet service needs increased for personal care (aOR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.03, 1.46) and meal delivery (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01, 1.56), and decreased for caregiver respite/support (aOR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.35, 0.70).
conclusionsDuring the PHE, simultaneous increase in services use and unmet service needs for some HCBS (e.g. personal care) suggests that temporary PHE measures taken were insufficient to offset the demand for those services. For caregiver respite/support, increased service use and decreased unmet service needs suggests that the temporary PHE measures for caregiver support may have offset a rise in service demand. These findings can inform evaluations of temporary PHE policies for HCBS and disaster preparedness efforts for future PHEs. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.