ReviewBMC nephrology2025
Kansas city cardiomyopathy questionnaire in cardiac function assessment of chronic kidney disease patients: a literature review.
Review in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients face an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, particularly heart failure (HF). The combination of CKD and HF (CKD-HF) presents significant challenges in diagnosis, assessment, and management due to the unique pathophysiological features of this patient population. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), a patient-reported outcomes measure widely used in clinical trials of HF, shows promise in addressing these challenges. However, the effectiveness and application of KCCQ in CKD patients, especially those with heart failure, have not been fully explored. This article aims to review the current evidence of KCCQ in CKD patients, highlighting its potential value while acknowledging the limitations of current research, and suggesting potential clinical applications that warrant further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.