ArticleBMC public health2025
To what extent does Together with Gloria! expand the reach of SASA! Together community programming? A mixed methods evaluation of an edutainment intervention in Kasese, Uganda.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCommunity-level interventions to prevent violence against women (VAW), though potentially efficacious, are challenging to implement at scale, requiring intensive long-term engagement. There is thus interest in the potential for mass-media strategies, including 'edutainment', to complement and extend the reach of in-person community programming. While edutainment interventions can demonstrably reach large audiences at relatively low cost, little is known about who they reach/exclude, nor about barriers/facilitators to engagement. This paper describes the extent to which 'Together with Gloria!' (TWG), a 33-episode radio-drama, expanded the reach of SASA! Together, a community-level VAW prevention intervention in Western Uganda.
methodsAs part of a broader mixed-methods evaluation, we conducted two cross-sectional community surveys: baseline (6-weeks into broadcasting); and endline (6-weeks after final broadcast). Qualitative data collection included focus group discussions and in-depth interviews with community members, local leaders and SASA! Together Community Activists. We present descriptive data on TWG's reach, and the extent to which people listened/discussed TWG with others. We use logistic regression to explore variation in reach by socio-demographic characteristics. Barriers/facilitators to engagement are explored using survey and qualitative data.
resultsAt endline (n = 1018), 52% of survey respondents reported having listened to TWG. Across all demographic sub-groups, exposure to TWG considerably exceeded exposure to in-person SASA! Together programming, with TWG listening more uniformly spread across villages. Among men, listening was positively associated with increasing age, having a partner and children, and radio ownership. Among women, listening was positively associated with secondary education, being childless, and owning a radio. Most listeners (74% men; 64% women) reported usually listening with others (most commonly a partner), and 41% had discussed TWG with other community members. Communal listening and multiple broadcast stations/timeslots were noted to facilitate listening. Barriers included lack of radio access (particularly among women), and lack of time.
conclusionsTWG expanded overall reach of in-person SASA! Together programming, and reduced geographical disparities in access. Use of multiple radio-stations/broadcasting timeslots allowed many to listen despite competing time-commitments. Future revisions to broaden access and appeal could include communal broadcasts in public places, and the incorporation of characters and storylines to resonate with younger childless men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.