Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41023911›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Does the timing of fetal reduction from dichorionic twin pregnancies to singleton pregnancies influence premature birth risk? A retrospective cohort study.

Minyue Tang, Qingfang Li, Huanmiao Yan, Guiquan Wang, Xiaoqian Zhou, Jiayu Xu, Saijun Sun, Lanfeng Xing, Yimin Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Minyue Tang *School of Medicine, Women's HospitalZhejiang UniversityShangcheng District, 1 Xueshi Road, Hangzhou, 310006, China. tangmy@zju.edu.cn.
Qingfang Li *Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong'an Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Huanmiao Yan *School of Medicine, Women's HospitalZhejiang UniversityShangcheng District, 1 Xueshi Road, Hangzhou, 310006, China.
Guiquan WangDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Xiaoqian ZhouSchool of Medicine, Women's HospitalZhejiang UniversityShangcheng District, 1 Xueshi Road, Hangzhou, 310006, China.
Jiayu XuSchool of Medicine, Women's HospitalZhejiang UniversityShangcheng District, 1 Xueshi Road, Hangzhou, 310006, China.
Saijun SunSchool of Medicine, Women's HospitalZhejiang UniversityShangcheng District, 1 Xueshi Road, Hangzhou, 310006, China.
Lanfeng XingSchool of Medicine, Women's HospitalZhejiang UniversityShangcheng District, 1 Xueshi Road, Hangzhou, 310006, China.
Yimin ZhuSchool of Medicine, Women's HospitalZhejiang UniversityShangcheng District, 1 Xueshi Road, Hangzhou, 310006, China. zhuyim@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

the Key research and development Program of Zhejiang Province 2025C02116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

capsuleThe gestational age at fetal reduction had no effect on pregnancy outcome when reduction was performed before 17 + 4 weeks. After 17 + 4 weeks, the later the fetal reduction was done, the earlier the delivery and lower the birthweight.

objectiveTo investigate the impact of gestational age at fetal reduction on pregnancy outcomes and identify the optimal reduction timing associated with the lowest advanced pregnancy outcome risk of dichorionic twins that were reduced to singleton.

backgroundPrevious studies have indicated gestational age at fetal reduction of twin pregnancies might be associated with risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. However, existing literature on this topic has been inconsistent. As fetal reduction in twin pregnancies is increasingly practiced, these data are important for clinicians when counseling couples about fetal reduction. STUDY

designA retrospective cohort study was conducted on dichorionic twin pregnancies that underwent fetal reduction to singletons at a single reproductive center between July 2005 and July 2021.

methodsSmooth curve fitting and a segmented regression model were utilized to analyze the threshold effect between the gestational age at fetal reduction and pregnancy outcomes, including pregnancy loss, gestational age at birth and birthweight. Then the study population was divided into two groups according to inflection point of gestational age at fetal reduction as early-reduction group and late-reduction group. The primary pregnancy outcomes compared between groups included the rates of pregnancy complications, pregnancy loss, preterm birth and low birthweight.

resultsIn total, 463 dichorionic twin pregnancies were included in the study. No significant correlation was found between pregnancy loss risk before 24 weeks and gestational age at reduction (P = 0.428). The gestational age at birth and birthweight shown a nonlinear change with increasing gestational age at reduction. When reduction was performed before 17

conclusionsFetal reduction of dichorionic twin pregnancies performed after 17 + 4 weeks increases risk of preterm birth and LBW, highlighting the need for enhanced monitoring and management of premature related risks. Fetal reduction before 17 + 4 weeks is a preferable option for dichorionic twin pregnancies as it reduces the risk of prematurity without increasing the risk of pregnancy loss. These findings provide new information for counseling couples with dichorionic (DC) twins about fetal reduction.

Indexed as

Gestational AgePregnancy Reduction, MultifetalPregnancy, TwinPremature BirthAdultBirth WeightFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsFetal reductionLow birthweightPregnancy lossPregnancy outcomePreterm birthTwins

Identifiers

PMID41023911
PMCPMC12482109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.