ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Spatiotemporal analysis and risk prediction of foodborne diseases based on meteorological risk factors: a case study of Wuxi city, China.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating Statistical and Machine-Learning Approaches forMicroorganisms · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGlobal climate change has significantly altered the reproduction conditions and transmission patterns of foodborne pathogens, leading to dynamic shifts in the seasonal distribution of foodborne diseases (FBDs). Existing studies primarily rely on traditional statistical models or single machine learning (ML) algorithms, which have limitations in capturing the nonlinear associations between meteorological factors and FBDs.
methodsThis study employed spatiotemporal scanning to investigate the spatiotemporal clustering characteristics of FBDs in Wuxi City, China, from 2019 to 2023. Four ML models, including decision tree (DT), backpropagation neural network (BPNN), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and long short-term memory network (LSTM), were constructed by integrating FBD surveillance data and concurrent climate data to predict FBD risks. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) were used to quantify the contributions of climatic factors to model predictions.
resultsSpatiotemporal scanning results revealed a significant seasonal clustering of FBDs in summer and autumn, with a 19.0% increase in the incidence rate in the primary clustering area during 2022–2023 compared to 2019–2021, and actual cases consistently exceeding predicted values across all periods. Model performance comparison showed that LSTM outperformed other models, achieving root mean square errors (RMSE) of 9.1021 and 8.1854, mean absolute errors (MAE) of 7.0461 and 5.7671, and symmetric mean absolute percentage errors (SMAPE) of 49.8365% and 43.2618% on the validation and test sets, respectively. SHAP value analysis identified temperature as the key climatic factor with a strong positive correlation with FBD risks, whereas the contributions of non-temperature factors varied significantly across different models.
conclusionThis study provides a scientific basis for accurate risk prediction and prevention strategies of FBDs through a multi-model comparison framework and interpretable analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.