ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Sound touch viscosity in the evaluation of median nerve in healthy volunteers-a preliminary study.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundQuantitative assessment of peripheral nerve viscoelasticity is important for understanding nerve physiology and detecting early neuropathic changes. However, reference values for the viscosity and stiffness of the median nerve in healthy adults are lacking. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 98 healthy volunteers (58 females, 40 males; mean age: 35 ± 12 years) were assessed using the Sound Touch Viscosity and shear wave elastography modules integrated into the Resona A20S ultrasound system. Viscosity and stiffness were measured at three anatomical locations: the carpal tunnel (MN1), mid-forearm (MN2), and 5 cm proximal to the elbow joint (MN3). Paired bilateral measurements were obtained, and demographic factors were analyzed for their influence.
resultsNo significant differences were found between the left and right median nerves (p > 0.05). MN1 showed the highest viscosity 1.83 Pa·s (1.48-2.13) and stiffness of 30.24 kPa (28.46-33.65) significantly greater than MN2 and MN3 (p < 0.001). Viscosity and stiffness were moderately correlated at all sites ((r = 0.39, 0.56, and 0.36; all p < 0.001). Males showed higher stiffness at all locations (p < 0.001) and higher viscosity at MN1 and MN2 (p = 0.039 and 0.011). While age and body mass index (BMI) showed no significant effects.
conclusionSTVi is a feasible and reproducible modality for quantifying median nerve viscoelasticity. Viscoelastic parameters vary significantly by anatomical location and sex, with no influence from age and BMI. These findings establish normative values and support the clinical applicability of Sound Touch Viscosity in peripheral nerve assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.