ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Specialty and age-based differences in awareness and attitudes towards antibiotic stewardship: a cross-sectional online survey on Japanese clinic physicians.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a critical global health issue, with inconsistent adherence to antimicrobial stewardship contributing to its worsening. This study aims to assess physicians' awareness and attitudes towards AMR and appropriate antimicrobial use across different medical specialties in Japan.
methodsAn online cross-sectional survey was conducted from January 31 to February 5, 2024, among 280 physicians from three specialties (internal medicine, pediatrics, and otorhinolaryngology) who were working in outpatient clinics in Japan. Participants were asked about their familiarity with the National Action Plan (NAP) on AMR and the manuals of Ministry of Health and Labor Welfare (MHLW) on prudent antimicrobial use. Their opinions on AMR facts and antibiotic use were also surveyed using five-point Likert scales. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, multilevel mixed-effects ordered logistic regression and generalized linear models to examine factors influencing NAP/manuals adherence.
resultsMost respondents were male (85%) and predominantly aged 50 and above (73.9%), Familiarity with the AMR Action Plan varied, with 36.4% of respondents reported understanding its content, while 37.5% only knew its name. Similarly, 27.1% of respondents used the MHLW manuals, whereas 48.6% were aware of them but did not use them. Internal medicine physicians showed the highest adherence to antimicrobial stewardship and most concern about AMR facts, while pediatricians demonstrated the highest adherence to MHLW manuals (AOR = 2.4, p = 0.000 compared to internal medicine doctors). Otorhinolaryngologists reported higher awareness of NAP (AOR = 2.6, p = 0.006 compared to internal medicine doctors) but had the lowest adherence to NAP and MHLW manuals. Younger physicians (< 50 years) were more proactive in addressing AMR and adhering to antimicrobial stewardship than older physicians. Messages emphasizing the prevention of drug resistance and societal impacts of AMR were most associated with positive attitudes from physicians in outpatient clinics.
conclusionsThis study highlights significant variability in AMR awareness and adherence across specialties and age groups. Internal medicine physicians showed the highest adherence, while pediatricians were the most familiar with AMR manuals. Otorhinolaryngologists demonstrated strong awareness but lower adherence. Targeted educational interventions, particularly focusing on older physicians and specific specialties, are needed to improve antimicrobial use and combat the growing threat of resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.