Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41023872›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2025

Estimating the causal effects of exposure mixtures: a generalized propensity score method.

Qian Gao, Ting Li, Guiming Zhu, Juping Wang, Kexin Qiu, Liangpo Liu, Xiujuan Yang, Tong Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Qian GaoDepartment of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, MOE Key Laboratory of Coal Environmental Pathogenicity and Prevention, Shanxi Medical University, No.56 Xinjian South Road, Taiyuan, 030001, Taiyuan, China.
Ting LiDepartment of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, MOE Key Laboratory of Coal Environmental Pathogenicity and Prevention, Shanxi Medical University, No.56 Xinjian South Road, Taiyuan, 030001, Taiyuan, China.
Guiming ZhuDepartment of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, MOE Key Laboratory of Coal Environmental Pathogenicity and Prevention, Shanxi Medical University, No.56 Xinjian South Road, Taiyuan, 030001, Taiyuan, China.
Juping WangDepartment of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, MOE Key Laboratory of Coal Environmental Pathogenicity and Prevention, Shanxi Medical University, No.56 Xinjian South Road, Taiyuan, 030001, Taiyuan, China.
Kexin QiuDepartment of Statistics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, 999077, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Liangpo LiuDepartment of Public Health Laboratory Sciences, School of Public Health, MOE Key Laboratory of Coal Environmental Pathogenicity and Prevention, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, China.
Xiujuan YangDepartment of Public Health Laboratory Sciences, School of Public Health, MOE Key Laboratory of Coal Environmental Pathogenicity and Prevention, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, China.
Tong WangDepartment of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, MOE Key Laboratory of Coal Environmental Pathogenicity and Prevention, Shanxi Medical University, No.56 Xinjian South Road, Taiyuan, 030001, Taiyuan, China. tongwang@sxmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Fundamental Research Program of Shanxi Province, China 202203021212382National Natural Science Foundation of China 32301421National Natural Science Foundation of China 82204163National Natural Science Foundation of China 82373692 and 82073674
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn environmental epidemiology and many other fields, estimating the causal effects of multiple concurrent exposures holds great promise for driving public health interventions and policy changes. Given the predominant reliance on observational data, confounding remains a key consideration, and generalized propensity score (GPS) methods are widely used as causal models to control measured confounders. However, current GPS methods for multiple continuous exposures remain scarce.

methodsWe proposed a novel causal model for exposure mixtures, called nonparametric multivariate covariate balancing generalized propensity score (npmvCBGPS). A simulation study examined whether npmvCBGPS, an existing multivariate GPS (mvGPS) method, and a linear regression model for the outcome can accurately and precisely estimate the effects of exposure mixtures in a variety of common scenarios. An application study illustrated the analysis of the causal role of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) on BMI.

resultsThe npmvCBGPS achieved acceptable covariate balance in all scenarios. The estimates were close to the true value as long as either the exposure or the outcome model was correctly specified, and the results were less impacted by correlations among mixture components. The accuracy and precision of mvGPS and the linear regression model relied on the correctly specified exposure model and outcome model, respectively. The npmvCBGPS outperformed mvGPS in all scenarios. The npmvCBGPS achieved better covariate balance than mvGPS and provided an overall inverse trend between the PFAS mixtures with BMI.

conclusionsIn this study, we proposed npmvCBGPS to accurately estimate the causal effects of multiple exposure mixtures on health outcomes. Our approach is applicable across various domains, with a particular emphasis on environmental epidemiology.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposurePropensity ScoreBody Mass IndexCausalityComputer SimulationFluorocarbonsHumansLinear ModelsModels, StatisticalFluorocarbonsCausal modelExposure-responseGeneralized propensity scoreMixturesMultiple exposures

Identifiers

PMID41023872
PMCPMC12482879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.