ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Detection of probable hantavirus infections in clinically suspected dengue patients in a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Orthohantavirus Infection Mimicking Acute Viral Hepatitis: An Underrecognized Clinical Presentation.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Hantavirus Disease: A Comprehensive Narrative Review of Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment.Cureus · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcute febrile illnesses, including dengue fever, are common causes of hospitalization in Sri Lanka. However, a significant proportion of clinically suspected dengue cases tested negative for dengue-specific markers, raising concerns about alternative infectious causes such as hantavirus. This study aimed to detect hantavirus infections among patients clinically suspected of dengue who tested negative for dengue NS1 and IgM antibodies and to analyze the epidemiology of hantavirus infections in febrile patients. METHODOLOGY: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Virology, National Hospital Kandy, from January to August 2023. A total of 415 serum samples from clinically suspected dengue patients who tested negative for dengue NS1 and IgM antibodies were selected. Hantavirus detection was performed using real-time RT-PCR and IgM antibody testing. Additional tests for flavivirus, alphavirus, and leptospirosis were also conducted. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected from hantavirus-positive cases.
resultsAmong the 415 samples, 21 (5.1%) tested positive for hantavirus IgM antibodies. None of the samples tested positive for hantavirus RNA. The demographic analysis revealed no significant difference in age or gender between hantavirus-positive and negative patients. Co-infection with leptospirosis was observed in one patient. In addition to fever, clinical features of hantavirus infection included dry cough (41.2%), vomiting (35.3%), and shortness of breath (23.5%). Laboratory findings showed elevated liver enzymes (AST: 61.5%, ALT: 53.8%), elevated creatinine (50%), and elevated CRP (72.7%).
conclusionThe putative 5.1% hantavirus seropositivity rate among clinically suspected dengue patients suggests that hantavirus should be considered in differential diagnoses. Although no hantavirus RNA was detected, the presence of IgM antibodies and negativity to other potential infections indicates a potential recent infection or probable cases. The study highlights the challenge of diagnosing hantavirus due to its similar presentation to dengue fever and the need for improved diagnostic testing. Early diagnosis and tailored management can improve patient outcomes and guide public health responses. Further studies and expanded diagnostic capabilities are recommended to better understand hantavirus prevalence and to improve clinical care for affected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.