ArticleBMC primary care2025
Association between prescription patterns and primary care clinic closures in South Korea: A longitudinal retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary care clinic sustainability affects healthcare service delivery. However, the impact of prescription patterns on primary care clinic sustainability remains unclear. We analyzed the association between prescription patterns of frequently used medications and primary care clinic closures in South Korea.
methodsWe used Korean National Health Insurance Service data on office-based primary care clinics established between 2003 and 2012, and their claims data from January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2015. We assessed the effects of prescription patterns on primary care clinic closures in Korea. Prescription patterns included prescription rates of benzodiazepines and injectable medications for all visits, antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections, and steroids for musculoskeletal diseases. We calculated these rates for the first year after the establishment of each clinic. We adjusted the association for patient-group- and clinic-related factors over 12 years. We used multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression for analyses.
resultsAmong 14,525 clinics, 4,681 were closed during the observation period. The average follow-up period was 5.3 years. An increase in the benzodiazepine prescription rate was associated with a lower risk of closure (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.82-0.92, per 10% point increase; p < 0.001). Steroid prescriptions for musculoskeletal diseases influenced clinic closure (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.94-0.99, per 10% point increase; p = 0.002). Prescription rates of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections (HR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.98-1.01; p = 0.496) and any injectable medications (HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.97-1.01; p = 0.247) did not affect primary care clinic closure.
conclusionsSteroid and benzodiazepine prescriptions were linked to lower clinic closure risk, while antibiotic and injectable prescriptions were not. These findings suggest that evidence-based prescribing may not compromise clinic viability and that appropriate care and sustainability can be achieved together through informed policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.