Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41023839›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Fundamental prognostic difference of ATM gene mutation and deletion in newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma.

Ales Obr, Diana Malarikova, Eva Kriegova, Helena Urbankova, Zuzana Zemanova, Jirina Manakova, Anna Petrackova, Michaela Vatolikova, Adela Berkova, Kristina Forsterova and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Ales ObrDepartment of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ales.obr@fnol.cz.
Diana MalarikovaFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Hematology, First Faculty of Medicine, University General Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Eva KriegovaDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Helena UrbankovaDepartment of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Zuzana ZemanovaCentre of Oncocytogenomics, Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jirina ManakovaDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Anna PetrackovaDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Michaela VatolikovaDepartment of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Adela BerkovaCentre of Oncocytogenomics, Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Kristina ForsterovaFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Hematology, First Faculty of Medicine, University General Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Tomas FurstDepartment of Mathematical Analysis and Applications of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Andrea HruskovaDepartment of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Patrik FlodrDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Veronika HanackovaDepartment of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Vit ProchazkaDepartment of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Tomas PapajikDepartment of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Marek TrnenyFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Hematology, First Faculty of Medicine, University General Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavel KlenerFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Hematology, First Faculty of Medicine, University General Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

Czech Science Foundation GA23-05377SInternal grant agency IGA_LF_2025_005Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic JG_2024_035Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic MH CZ - DRO (FNOl, 00098892)Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic MH CZ-DRO-VFN-64165the European Union - Next Generation EU EXCELES, ID Project No. LX22NPO5102The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (LLS) MCL 7005-24
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have suggested that, after acquisition of t(11;14), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) pathogenesis may proceed via several different genetic second hits, which may shape different mutational profiles of clinically manifest lymphoma. The most prevalent second hit in MCL includes ATM aberrations, accounting for about half of patients with newly diagnosed MCL. As ATM and TP53 mutations tend to be exclusive in MCL, we retrospectively analyzed the prognostic role of ATM deletions and/or mutations in patients with newly diagnosed MCL, both in the entire cohort and in a subcohort of patients with wild-type TP53.

methodsTo investigate deletions and mutations of ATM and TP53 in newly diagnosed MCL, we used fluorescence in situ hybridization and next-generation sequencing. To assess relationships between variables, non-parametric (Spearman) and chi-square tests were used. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to analyze differences in continuous variables between two groups of patients. For survival analyses, the standard Kaplan-Meier estimator and log-rank test were employed. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the prognostic value of various factors on patient survival.

resultsWe analyzed 187 patients with MCL (a median follow-up of 3.6 years). Eighty-one (43%) and 75 (40%) patients had ATM and TP53 aberrations, respectively. Of note, three (9%) patients with mutated ATM harbored a germline mutation. Patients with TP53 aberration had shorter survival rates. Although ATM deletion did not correlate with progression-free survival (PFS) in the entire cohort, it was associated with shorter PFS (hazard ratio 2.25, p = 0.01) in patients with wild-type TP53. A higher frequency of ATM deletion correlated with shorter PFS. Patients with ATM mutation (and wild-type TP53) had a trend toward better PFS (albeit not statistically significant). Moreover, patients with a higher variant allele frequency of ATM mutation tended to have longer PFS.

conclusionsATM deletion is an important predictor of prognosis in MCL patients and should be routinely examined, especially in those with wild-type TP53. In contrast, an isolated ATM mutation may predict a better prognosis in the context of standard immunochemotherapy.

Indexed as

Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsLymphoma, Mantle-CellAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCzech RepublicFemaleGene DeletionHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationPrognosisSurvival AnalysisTumor Suppressor Protein p53Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATM protein, humanTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53ATMDeletionMantle cell lymphomaMutationSurvival

Identifiers

PMID41023839
PMCPMC12481964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.