ArticleBMC genomics2025
Comprehensive profiling of ribo-seq detected small sequences in yeast reveals robust conservation patterns and their potential mechanisms of origin.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the widespread adoption of ribosome profiling technology has allowed the discovery of evidence of transcription and translation for thousands of small proteins or microproteins whose importance was once disregarded. Both conserved and evolutionarily short-lived microproteins have demonstrated relevant involvement in biological functions. However, sequences exist in a broad spectrum of conservation. Here, we tested whether these small proteins in yeast detected by ribosome profiling technology have different properties across their levels of conservation, and how do these properties compare with the canonical small protein-coding sequences.
resultsHere, we applied a phylostratigraphic approach to peptides encoded by small open reading frames. We compared 20,023 ribo-seq-detected small peptides against annotated small proteins belonging to reference annotations on the basis of their respective conservation patterns. We identified 1134 unannotated microproteins that, despite their difficulty in being detected by methods other than ribosome profiling, display hallmarks of functionality such as conservation across many taxonomical levels and signals of purifying selection not dissimilar to those of canonical proteins of comparable length. Sequences that initially did not show evidence of belonging to any gene family were found to possess signals of homology traceable mostly at genus level when compared against noncoding regions and using TBLASTN, but also, to a lesser extent, to species belonging to the phyla Basidiomycota and Microsporidia. In addition, we show an analysis of the mutations behind the origin of small open reading frames exclusive to S. cerevisiae and identified changes in the initiation codon as the most common group of mutations when compared to Saccharomyces paradoxus, the closest species to S. cerevisiae.
conclusionsOur work, by presenting robust analysis of the extended landscape of small proteins in yeast, suggests that small conserved sequences, either canonical or not, possess a shared evolutionary trajectory, as demonstrated by their properties. These results shed some light into the evolutionary processes behind the extended landscape of small proteins in yeast.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.