ArticleJournal of eating disorders2025
Changes in eGFR in adolescent and young adult inpatients receiving nutritional rehabilitation for a restrictive eating disorder: a five-year clinical audit.
Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Does renal function decline across multiple hospital admissions? An audit of adolescent and young adults hospitalised with a restrictive eating disorder.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImpaired renal function may be observed in individuals with a restrictive eating disorder, yet its prevalence and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms are inadequately characterised. The impact of elevated protein intake on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in this demographic remains unclear, leading to a lack of specific guidelines regarding protein prescriptions during inpatient treatment. This study describes changes in eGFR as a marker of renal function among adolescents and young adults receiving inpatient care for restrictive eating disorders and evaluates protein prescriptions during nutritional rehabilitation.
methodsA retrospective audit of adolescent and young adults hospitalised with restrictive eating disorders (2016-2020) on a specialised medical ward was conducted. Data collected included anthropometric measurements, age, serum creatinine, blood urea, energy and protein prescriptions, medical stability upon admission, and hospital length-of-stay. The eGFR was calculated using the CKiDU25 equation. A random intercepts model was employed to assess the relationship between protein intake and eGFR changes during hospitalisation, controlling for confounding variables including age, sex, %mBMI, medical instability, and purging history.
resultsAmong the 187 admissions that met inclusion criteria, the mean age was 17.0 ± 1.2 years, 90.9% (n = 170) were females, and mean %mBMI was 80.1 ± 9.5% at admission. Impaired renal function (eGFR < 90 mL/min/1.73 m²) was observed in 35.3% of patients at admission, and 3.2% of patients at discharge. Protein intake increased from 1.9 ± 0.4 g/kg/day on admission to 2.7 ± 0.6 g/kg/day at discharge.
conclusionsImpaired renal function was observed in approximately one third of this sample of adolescents and young adults hospitalised with restrictive eating disorders and typically resolves during the admission. A high protein prescription of 1.9-2.7 g/kg/day did not deleteriously affect renal function, with eGFR levels improving with nutritional rehabilitation. Prospective studies are needed to confirm the optimal protein prescription during nutritional rehabilitation in patients hospitalised with restrictive eating disorders, and to further explore outcomes in the small subgroup of patients who remain with renal impairment at discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.