Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41023743›Full record

ArticleInternational breastfeeding journal2025

Validity of an ion selective electrode for measuring human milk sodium and potassium ion levels at point-of-care in lactating mothers with inflammatory breast conditions.

Emma Heron, Ching Tat Lai, Leanda McKenna, Adelle McArdle, Donna Geddes

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International breastfeeding journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emma HeronSchool of Allied Health, Curtin University, Kent St, Bentley, WA, 6102, Australia. emma.duff@postgrad.curtin.edu.au.
Ching Tat LaiSchool of Molecular Sciences, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.
Leanda McKennaSchool of Allied Health, Curtin University, Kent St, Bentley, WA, 6102, Australia.
Adelle McArdleMonash Rural Health, Monash University, Northways Rd, Churchill, VIC, 3842, Australia.
Donna GeddesSchool of Molecular Sciences, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.

Funding

Department of Education, Australian Government Research Training ProgramMercy Health, Australia Small Grants 2021/22 and 2022/23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElevated human milk sodium (Na+) levels and Na+ to potassium (K+) ratios are commonly used in research to define breast inflammation in lactating mothers. Portable Na+ and K+ ion selective electrode probes (ISEPs) allow for immediate point-of-care testing by clinicians, potentially accelerating diagnosis, and treatment of inflammatory conditions of the lactating breast (ICLB). We determined validity of ISEPs compared to the reference method inductively coupled plasma - optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) in mothers with ICLB, and acceptability of ISEP point-of-care testing of mothers tested with clinical ICLB symptoms.

methodsHuman milk samples were collected from 43 mothers with ICLB, between December 2021 and September 2022. Mothers were recruited from private physiotherapy practices, a public women's hospital, and the local community, in Melbourne, Australia. Human milk Na+, K+ and Na+:K+ ratio levels were tested at point-of-care (ISEPs), and later, in the laboratory (ICP-OES). Adjusted limits of agreement with Bland-Altman plots compared the two measurement methods, with rank linear mixed effects models establishing their relationship. Mother's ISEP acceptability was assessed via two survey questions (0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) and open text response) and analysed via descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.

resultsAdjusted limits of agreement (lower limit mean (95% CI) to upper limit mean (95% CI)) between the two measurement methods were: -6.12 (-7.75, -4.49) to 6.12 (4.49, 7.75) mM for Na+; 7.37 (5.82, 9.47) to 25.6 (23.5, 27.7) mM for K+; and -0.82 (-0.85, -0.79) to 0.80 (0.77, 0.82) mM for Na+:K+ ratio. For Na+:K+ ratio, 100% of values fell within the limits of agreement. For Na+ and Na+:K+ ratio, ISEPs and ICP-OES shared a substantial amount of variability (Na+: conditional R

conclusionsPoint-of-care human milk ISEP Na+:K+ ratio measurement in mothers with ICLB is valid and is rated as a highly acceptable clinical assessment tool by mothers with ICLB.

Indexed as

Ion-Selective ElectrodesLactationMastitisMilk, HumanPoint-of-Care SystemsPoint-of-Care TestingPotassiumSodiumAdultAustraliaFemaleHumansReproducibility of ResultsPotassiumSodiumBreast inflammationHuman milkICP-OESIon selective electrodeMothersPoint-of-carePotassiumSodium

Identifiers

PMID41023743
PMCPMC12482321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.