ArticleBMC nursing2025
Evaluation of the effectiveness of isolation training given to the caregivers of patients in isolation with different methods: a randomized controlled study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06638164 (Evaluation of the Efficiency of Isolation Training Given to Caregivers of Isolated Individuals With Different Methods), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the Efficiency of Isolation Training Given to Caregivers of Isolated Individuals With Different Methods
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
aimCaregivers of patients with communicable diseases or immune deficiencies must understand and correctly apply isolation procedures. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the isolation training given to the caregivers of patients who are isolated with different methods.
methodThis research is the first study in which isolation training was given with virtual reality and was conducted as a randomized controlled experimental study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06638164-10/09/2024). The patient caregivers recruited during the training of the hospital in the intensive care unit and wards. The sample was randomized into a control group (n = 30) and an experimental group receiving virtual training (n = 30). In collecting the data; "Structured Information Form", "Knowledge Test on Isolation Precautions", "Skill Checklist on Isolation Precautions" and "Satisfaction with Education Survey" were used. The data obtained in the study were analyzed using the SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) for Windows 25.0 program.
results48.3% (n = 29) of the caregivers participating in the study were between the ages of 40-50 and 56.7% (n = 34) were male of the patients, 71.7% (n = 43) had bloodstream infection and 55% (n = 33) were in contact isolation. The skill total scores (81.58 ± 7.23) and satisfaction total scores (59.10 ± 2.51) of the caregivers in the experimental group were higher than the skill total scores (51.08 ± 7.61) and satisfaction total scores (55.06 ± 2.31) of the caregivers in the control group.In addition, the knowledge posttest measurements of the experimental group (7.70 ± 1.17) were higher than the information posttest measurements of the control group (5.23 ± 1.43). CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS: As a result of this study, it was concluded that the isolation training given to the caregivers of the individuals in isolation is beneficial in terms of increasing the knowledge and skill levels of the caregivers, and that the caregivers are satisfied with such technological training methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.