ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025
Geographic disparities in inpatient service in primary care and patients' choice of first point of consultation: a linked cross-sectional survey and administrative data analysis in Shaanxi of China.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe enhancement of primary care capacity and service quality has been demonstrated in numerous developed countries as an effective strategy for establishing hierarchical healthcare delivery systems. However, this established pattern shows limited applicability in China's context. Our study investigates through empirical analysis whether strengthened inpatient service in primary care effectively incentivizes patients to select primary healthcare institutions (PHIs) as their first-point consultation (FPC) choice in Shaanxi, a western province in China, and whether this effect exhibits consistent efficacy across all regions.
methodsThis study Linked the National Health Services Survey on population and administrative data on PHIs in 2023 in Shaanxi. 4,570 first point consultations from 4,464 patients in 3,704 households were included in our study. Generalized linear mixed models were employed to estimate the association between the annual number of hospitalizations of PHIs and patients' choice of PHIs as their FPC.
resultsOur findings demonstrated a positive association between annual number of hospitalizations in PHIs and increased FPC rates at PHIs (OR = 1.151, 95% CI 1.059 to 1.254). However, significant geographic heterogeneity emerged, with effects confined to urban-rural transition zones (OR = 2.457, 95% CI 1.768 to 3.415) and rural areas (OR = 2.322, 95% CI 1.672 to 3.223). Socioeconomic stratification analysis revealed an inverse relationship between household income quartiles and PHIs utilization rates, the lower the economic levels of residents in these areas, the higher the rate of first point consultation in PHIs will be.
conclusionOur findings suggest that inpatient service in primary care enhancement exhibits heterogeneous effects on FPC rates across China's geographic and socioeconomic strata. Policy prioritization should focus on targeted interventions in underserved rural regions with medical resource scarcity, potentially yielding greater equity dividends in healthcare access. Improving the capacity of primary care services should remain a key direction of health system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.