ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Clinical score for early escalation in pediatric A2063G Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of an early warning score for refractoryTranslational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics and predictors of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia coinfection with Bordetella pertussis in children.Medicine · 2026Article
- Doxycycline for Macrolide-ResistantInfection and drug resistance · 2026Review
- Macrolide-resistantFrontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Construction of a nomogram combining CT and serum markers for predicting macrolide resistance gene mutation status in pediatric Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMacrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MRMP), primarily driven by the 23 S rRNA A2063G mutation, is increasingly prevalent among East Asian children, diminishing azithromycin efficacy. Although some patients benefit from its anti-inflammatory properties, delayed escalation in non-responders can prolong fever and increase complications. Given the age-related risks of tetracyclines and fluoroquinolones, determining which children truly require second-line therapy remains a clinical challenge.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 112 children with MRMP carrying the 23 S rRNA A2063G mutation. Patients were categorized into an azithromycin group (n = 66) and a second-line therapy group (n = 46). Between-group comparisons were performed using the χ² test, independent-sample t test, or Mann-Whitney U test. Independent predictors of escalation were identified via multivariable logistic regression, and model performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
resultsCompared with the second-line group, the azithromycin group had longer fever duration (median 7.00 vs. 5.00 days, P = 0.003) and slightly higher peak temperatures (39.20 °C vs. 39.00 °C, P = 0.016). In contrast, escalated patients exhibited significantly higher procalcitonin (PCT) levels (1.23 vs. 0.30 ng/mL, P < 0.001), greater chest CT total severity scores (TSS) (13.50 vs. 4.00, P < 0.001), and more frequent Streptococcus pneumoniae co-infection (65.22% vs. 39.39%, P = 0.012). Logistic regression identified elevated PCT, higher TSS, and ≥ 2 co-pathogens as independent predictors of escalation, while therapeutic bronchoscopy was protective; age was included as a covariate. The model demonstrated excellent discrimination (AUC 0.938, 95% CI 0.89-0.99; sensitivity 100%, specificity 78.8%). A five-item bedside score (cutoff ≥ 3.6) retained high accuracy (AUC 0.926; sensitivity 95.7%, specificity 86.4%).
conclusionsA simple clinical scoring model incorporating PCT, TSS, co-pathogen burden, bronchoscopy status, and age demonstrated good predictive accuracy in identifying children with A2063G-positive MRMP pneumonia who may benefit from early escalation to second-line therapy. Its use in clinical practice may support timely intervention for high-risk patients while minimizing unnecessary antibiotic escalation. Further prospective validation in multicenter cohorts is needed to confirm its generalizability and clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.