ArticleBMC genomics2025
Decoding the genetic architecture of women reproductive aging: multi-omic integration identifies novel loci and mechanistic pathways for precision intervention.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Currently, little is understood about the genetic architecture underlying Genome-wide association study (GWAS)-related traits that influence the reproductive ageing of women. To address this knowledge gap, we estimated causal single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) independent of variation in the reproductive of women via genomic structural equation modelling and multiple post-GWAS methodologies. This approach led to the identification of 99 genome-wide significant loci. Next, we employed various transcriptome-wide association methods to analyse highly correlated susceptibility gene signal loci and their associated regulatory elements in relation to a GWAS of reproductive ageing in women. These analyses were integrated at the tissue, cellular, and genomic element levels. Additionally, we evaluated the significant correlations between 1,200 identified susceptibility factors and the GWAS signals relevant to the reproductive ageing of women. The polygenic scores obtained through summary statistics were further used to clarify the risk evidence of different chromosomes based on structural equations and their relationship with the reproductive ageing of women. Through the analysis of a GWAS that did not directly measure phenotypes, our study provides for the first time a comprehensive characterization of the genetic structure of the reproductive ageing of women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.