Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41023597›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2025

Addition of sufentanil to fospropofol disodium during induction of general anesthesia shortens time to sedation onset in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Wei Li, Jingwen Ning, Xiaozhu Sheng, Weiju Liu, Yannan Zhou, Qiying Shen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wei Li *Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No 218, Ji Xi Road, Hefei, 230032, China.
Jingwen Ning *Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No 218, Ji Xi Road, Hefei, 230032, China.
Xiaozhu ShengDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No 218, Ji Xi Road, Hefei, 230032, China.
Weiju LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No 218, Ji Xi Road, Hefei, 230032, China.
Yannan ZhouDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No 218, Ji Xi Road, Hefei, 230032, China.
Qiying ShenDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No 218, Ji Xi Road, Hefei, 230032, China. shenqiying@ahmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFospropofol disodium is a water-soluble prodrug of propofol, with a significantly longer time to sedation than propofol. This prospective randomized controlled study aimed to evaluate the effect of adding sufentanil to fospropofol disodium during induction of general anesthesia on sedation quality in elderly patients.

methodsOne hundred and fifty elderly patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either fospropofol disodium (F group) or sufentanil combined with fospropofol disodium (S + F group) (n = 75 each). Patients randomized to F group received fospropofol disodium 10-15 mg/kg within 1 min for anesthesia induction. Patients randomized to S + F group received sufentanil 0.2-0.4 µg/kg, followed by fospropofol disodium within 1 min. The primary outcome was time to loss of consciousness, defined as the time to a Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) score of 1 after administration of fospropofol disodium. Secondary outcomes included sedation success rate and hemodynamic parameters. Safety outcomes included the incidence of adverse reactions such as injection pain, pruritus, and paresthesia.

resultsCompared to the F group, the S + F group had a significantly shorter time to loss of consciousness (91.00 [70.00, 112.00] s vs. 142.50 [121.00, 192.25] s, P < 0.001) and a higher sedation success rate (100% [75/75] vs. 90.7% [68/75], P = 0.020). The incidence of pruritus and paresthesia was significantly lower in the S + F group than in the F group (P < 0.05).

conclusionIn elderly patients undergoing general anesthesia, the combination of sufentanil and fospropofol disodium significantly shortened the time to loss of consciousness, improved sedation success and reduced the incidence of adverse reactions compared with fospropofol disodium alone.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralAnesthetics, IntravenousHypnotics and SedativesPropofolSufentanilAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesTime FactorsAnesthetics, IntravenousfospropofolHypnotics and SedativesPropofolSufentanilElderlyFospropofolGeneral anesthesiaInductionSufentanil

Identifiers

PMID41023597
PMCPMC12482348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.