ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy strategies for optimizing safety and efficacy in elderly patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe completion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer (GC) is suboptimal, particularly in elderly patients. While neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally advanced GC has shown promise, data on elderly patients remain limited. Given the considerable physical burden of NAC, optimizing its administration is crucial. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of a modified approach for elderly patients.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 38 patients with cStage II/III GC who received NAC between November 2015 and December 2023. Additionally, 25 patients aged ≥ 75 years with cStage III who underwent upfront surgery during the same period were analyzed.
resultsThe NAC group was divided into non-elderly (< 75 years, n = 27) and elderly (≥ 75 years, n = 11) groups. The elderly group had poorer ECOG-PS (p = 0.016). While all non-elderly patients completed ≤ 3 cycles, more elderly patients underwent 4 cycles (p = 0.0047). However, per-cycles of S-1 (p = 0.0003) and oxaliplatin (p = 0.0018) were lower in the elderly group. Importantly, adverse events and treatment efficacy were comparable between groups. Among patients aged ≥ 75 years, the upfront surgery group had poorer ECOG-PS (p = 0.017) and underwent more frequent distal gastrectomy (p = 0.014).
conclusionsNAC can be safely administered to elderly patients by increasing cycles while reducing per-cycle dosage. It may also serve as a viable alternative to upfront surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.