ArticleInternational journal of bipolar disorders2025
The role of predominant polarity in older age bipolar disorder.
Article in International journal of bipolar disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPredominant polarity (PP) has emerged as a valuable course specifier in bipolar disorder (BD) with implications for prognosis and treatment planning. As the BD population ages, understanding its clinical characteristics becomes essential to tailor personalized interventions across the lifespan. This study aimed to characterize the distribution and clinical profiles of PP subgroups in a cohort of older adults with BD (OABD).
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 101 euthymic OABD aged >50 years. Clinical, neuropsychological and functional characteristics were compared between depressive (DPP), manic (MPP), and undetermined predominant polarity (UPP) subgroups, based on at least 2/3 of lifetime episodes being either depressive or manic polarity.
resultsUPP was the most frequent PP in OABD (59.4%), followed by DPP (27.7%) and MPP (12.9%). Patients with DPP presented a later age of onset, a depressive first episode, less psychiatric hospitalizations, and a trend to outperform MPP and UPP in visual memory. Participants with MPP presented more frequently with manic onset. The UPP subgroup exhibited worse clinical outcomes, including higher number of total episodes, more frequent suicidal ideation and seasonality, and worse financial disability compared to DPP.
conclusionPP classification distinguishes meaningful clinical and cognitive subgroups in OABD. The UPP subgroup associates with greater illness severity and functional impairment. These findings support the integration of PP into personalized treatment and prevention strategies in aging BD. Future longitudinal studies are needed to further clarify the trajectory of PP across the lifespan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.