Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41023566›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2025

Revisiting Religion and BMI: Recent Evidence from Australia.

Michael A Kortt, Michael B Charles, Luan Vinicius Bernardelli, Brian Dollery

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael A KorttDepartment of Management Science & Engineering, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, UAE. michael.kortt@ku.ac.ae.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3556-3001
Michael B CharlesFaculty of Business Law and Arts, Southern Cross University, Gold Coast, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2621-2656
Luan Vinicius BernardelliSpecial Academic Unit of Applied Social Sciences, Federal University of Goiás, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1410-2318
Brian DolleryUNE Business School, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2760-865X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the association between religion and body mass index (BMI) for a representative sample of the Australian population. We used data from five waves of the Household Income Labour Dynamics Australia (HILDA) Survey to analyse responses from 58,694 adults aged 18+. Our OLS regression analysis reveals that religious affiliation significantly influences BMI for both men and women, even after controlling for sociodemographic factors, health behaviour and psychological variables. Among men, those identifying as Catholic, Anglican (Episcopalian), or belonging to mainline Protestant denominations have, on average, a higher BMI than those reporting no religious affiliation. Among women, individuals affiliated with mainline or conservative Protestant denominations also exhibit higher average BMIs than those reporting no religious affiliation. Conversely, across both genders, non-Christians generally have lower average BMIs compared to non-religious individuals. We found that the frequency of religious attendance and the perceived importance of religion have minimal impact on BMI.

Indexed as

AustraliaBMIHealthObesityReligion

Identifiers

PMID41023566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.