ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Evaluation of Context-Aware Prompting Techniques for Classification of Tumor Response Categories in Radiology Reports Using Large Language Model.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- RadCoT: a Radiological Chain-of-Thought framework for enhanced error detection in radiology reports.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Radiology reports are essential for medical decision-making, providing crucial data for diagnosing diseases, devising treatment plans, and monitoring disease progression. While large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in processing free-text reports, research on effective prompting techniques for radiologic applications remains limited. To evaluate the effectiveness of LLM-driven classification based on radiology reports in terms of tumor response category (TRC), and to optimize the model through a comparison of four different prompt engineering techniques for effectively performing this classification task in clinical applications, we included 3062 whole-spine contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiology reports for prompt engineering and validation. TRCs were labeled by two radiologists based on criteria modified from the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines. The Llama3 instruct model was used to classify TRCs in this study through four different prompts: General, In-Context Learning (ICL), Chain-of-Thought (CoT), and ICL with CoT. AUROC, accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score were calculated against each prompt and model (8B, 70B) with the test report dataset. The average AUROC for ICL (0.96 internally, 0.93 externally) and ICL with CoT prompts (0.97 internally, 0.94 externally) outperformed other prompts. Error increased with prompt complexity, including 0.8% incomplete sentence errors and 11.3% probability-classification inconsistencies. This study demonstrates that context-aware LLM prompts substantially improved the efficiency and effectiveness of classifying TRCs from radiology reports, despite potential intrinsic hallucinations. While further improvements are required for real-world application, our findings suggest that context-aware prompts have significant potential for segmenting complex radiology reports and enhancing oncology clinical workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.