ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2025
Molecular dynamics simulation of polymerization kinetics, dimensional stability, and in silico toxicity of nextgeneration silicone impression materials in dentistry.
Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates how next-generation silicone impression materials intended for dental use behave during polymerization, as well as their dimensional stability, mechanical properties, degradation patterns, and in silico toxicity levels. Silicone materials are preferred for dental applications because of their outstanding mechanical properties and compatibility with biological tissues. The performance of these materials is susceptible to environmental conditions including temperature changes, humidity levels, and exposure to oral fluids. Patient safety requires evaluation of degradation product toxicity concerns. It is crucial to examine these properties at the molecular level to enhance material durability and safety during clinical use. The structural, mechanical, and stability properties of silicone materials were modeled through molecular dynamics (MD) simulations using BIOVIA Materials Studio 2020. Material characterization and evaluation of mechanical properties were performed with the Forcite module using the COMPASSIII force field. The study simulated polymerization dynamics to understand the reaction mechanisms while employing the Kinetix and DMol3 modules to analyze dimensional stability under various environmental stresses. The CASTEP and DMol3 modules, along with the OSIRIS DataWarrior, were employed to forecast degradation pathways and potential toxicity. The combination of an elastic modulus of 2.533 GPa and tensile strength of 5.387 MPa allows Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) to show superior flexibility and rigidity, which qualifies it as the best choice for dental impression materials. Methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane (3.248 GPa) and hexaphenylcyclotrisiloxane (3.017 GPa) exhibited enhanced stiffness, suggesting their usefulness in load-bearing scenarios. In silico toxicity predictions indicated that most silicone derivatives demonstrated acceptable biocompatibility, although some silane compounds showed potential risks requiring further experimental validation. Under simulated conditions, the materials maintained stable configurations and exhibited positive polymerization dynamics, indicating that they could provide high durability along with dimensional stability for dental usage. This study highlights the superior balance of flexibility, rigidity, and safety exhibited by PDMS, while also identifying Methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane and hexaphenylcyclotrisiloxane as candidates for specialized load-bearing dental applications. Promising in silico findings require experimental validation and clinical testing to establish their practical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.