Trial reportNature medicine2025
Genomically matched therapy in advanced solid tumors: the randomized phase 2 ROME trial.
Trial report in Nature medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04591431 (The Rome Trial From Histology to Target), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Rome Trial From Histology to Target: the Road to Personalize Target Therapy and Immunotherapy
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Molecular Tumor Boards clinical impact on patient care and structural features: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Precision Medicine and Artificial Intelligence in Next-Generation Cancer Surgery: A Comprehensive Analysis of Clinical Applications, Therapeutic Outcomes, and Implementation Strategies.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical metastatic cancer from initiation to colonization: emerging challenges and breakthroughs.Oncogene · 2026Review
- Network-Integrated Platform for Clinical Trial Navigation from the New South Wales Early Phase Clinical Trials Alliance.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Article
- Retrospective analysis of real-world clinical use of comprehensive genomic profiling in solid tumors in Finland 2017-2020.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
- Performance and Clinical Benefit of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of GI Tumors in a Comprehensive Cancer Center.JCO precision oncology · 2026Article
- Molecular profiling and access to treatment for rare cancers in Europe.Nature communications · 2026Article
- From Recommendation to Implementation: Clinical Outcomes of a Single-Center Molecular Tumor Board.Targeted oncology · 2026Article
- Deep molecular profiling of biliary tract cancer uncovers novel biological mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.ESMO open · 2026Article
- Genomic Therapy Matching in Rare and Refractory Cancers.JAMA oncology · 2026Article
- The role of the molecular tumor board: learnings from the ROME trial.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Molecular Profiling for Precision Oncology: Moving Beyond Feasibility and Safety.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026Article
- Immune Cell Modulation of Patient-Matched Organoid Drug Response in Precision Cancer Medicine Platform.Cells · 2026Article
- Prolonged response to combined BRAF and MEK inhibition in BRAF mutant colorectal cancer, a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Targeting tumor transition windows.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026Review
- Review
- Liquid biopsy biomarkers for cancer detection, treatment monitoring, and clinical outcome prediction.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Article
- Can TP53, TMB and TME Expand the Immunotherapy Benefit in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer?Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
47 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite recent advancements demonstrating the potential of tumor-agnostic biomarkers to guide effective therapies, randomized evidence supporting the clinical superiority of precision oncology approaches compared to standard therapies remains limited. The ROME trial was a multicenter, randomized, open-label phase 2 study comparing tailored treatment (TT) to standard of care (SoC) in patients with advanced solid tumors progressing after one or two lines of therapy. Comprehensive genomic profiling on tissue and blood was performed to identify actionable alterations. Overall response rate (ORR) was the primary endpoint, and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure (TTF), time to next treatment (TTNT) and safety were the secondary endpoints. Between November 2020 and August 2023, 1,794 patients were screened, 897 were evaluated by the molecular tumor board (MTB) and 400 were randomized to TT or SoC. TT achieved a significantly higher ORR (17.5% versus 10%; P = 0.0294) and improved median PFS (3.5 months versus 2.8 months; hazard ratio = 0.66 (0.53-0.82), P = 0.0002). TT also showed superior 12-month PFS rates (22.0% versus 8.3%). Median OS was similar, with a 52% crossover rate. Grade 3/4 adverse events were also similar (40% TT versus 52% SoC). These results highlight the potential of TT to improve outcomes for patients with diverse actionable genomic alterations. These results also provide relevant evidence supporting a tumor-agnostic precision oncology strategy and highlight the potential of TTs, guided by genomic profiling and MTB recommendations, to significantly improve outcomes for patients with diverse actionable genomic alterations. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04591431 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.