SynthesisDie Anaesthesiologie2025
[Prevention and treatment of long-term sequelae in critically ill patients-the responsibility of intensive care medicine].
Synthesis in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients who have survived a critical illness requiring intensive care treatment often suffer from persistent complaints, collectively referred to as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). This syndrome includes both new and worsening symptoms that impair the quality of life and restrict activities of daily living and often hinder successful social and occupational reintegration. In addition to improving acute treatment, the transition from the intensive care unit (ICU) to standard care and long-term follow-up are rapidly becoming an important area of care improvement.
objectiveThis review identifies and discusses relevant risk factors as well as preventive and therapeutic measures for the long-term care of critically ill patients. The focus is on the role of intensive care medicine in setting the course for optimal follow-up after critical illness.
methodsBased on a systematic literature search, the results of previous studies are narratively synthesized to derive implications for the scientific and clinical practice. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Up to 70% of critically ill patients experience relevant impairments during the first year after intensive care treatment. Besides optimization of acute treatment depending on individual needs, the systematic documentation and seamless communication of information regarding the intensive care course as well as close interdisciplinary collaboration are essential to minimize long-term complications. Intensive care medicine plays a key role in the care of critically ill patients even beyond ICU discharge by ensuring that, through sound decision-making and planning of the next steps during intensive care, short-term, medium-term and long-term goals can be achieved in a timely manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.