ArticleZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2025
[MosaiK-Mobile geriatric rehabilitation in short-term care : Results of the process evaluation].
Article in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRehabilitation measures in short-term care (KuP), e.g., in the form of mobile geriatric rehabilitation (MoGeRe), are rarely carried out. One of the reasons for this is that the need for rehabilitation is not identified in advance. RESEARCH QUESTION AND
objectiveThe MosaiK (mobile geriatric rehabilitation in short-term care) project aimed to identify the rehabilitation needs of people registered for a KuP at an early stage, initiate a MoGeRe and improve the quality of the two health service areas. MATERIAL AND
methodsA checklist was used to identify the need for rehabilitation by the KuP admission management. If the results were positive, referring physicians were asked to apply for a MoGeRe for the future KuP guest. If the MoGeRe was approved, case conferences were held in which KuP personnel participated. Video visits between the MoGeRe and the patients and an arm and leg trainer for self-training during the therapy-free period supplemented the program. The processes were evaluated qualitatively in the form of focus groups as well as descriptively and quantitatively.
resultsIn 40 cases a review of the need for rehabilitation was suggested by the KuP admission management based on the results of the checklist. The MoGeRe was approved in 27 out of 28 applications. The joint case conference was held at least once for 70.0% of MosaiK patients and a video visit was carried out for 75.0%; the arm and leg trainer was used in 64% of cases.
conclusionThe implementation of the newly implemented processes was largely successful and required relatively little additional effort compared to (remunerated) routine care. The approach should therefore also be transferable to other forms of MoGeRe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41023448What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.