Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Prevalence of analgesic refusal and reasons for refusal among children and parents in the pediatric emergency department.
Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Analgesic refusal in the emergency department can be a barrier to optimal pain management. This study aimed to quantify the prevalence of analgesic refusal among pediatric patients and their caregivers in this setting and to explore possible determinants and rationale for such refusal. This cross-sectional observational study was conducted at a tertiary-level pediatric emergency department in Italy from July to December 2023. A questionnaire was offered to children presenting with moderate to severe pain and their parents, collecting amnestic and clinical data. In case of analgesic refusal, the questionnaire asked for the reason. The primary outcome was the prevalence of analgesic refusal. Among 799 children with moderate to severe pain, 116 children refused the analgesia, yielding an overall refusal rate of 18.3%. Children with moderate pain, pain duration of 12-24 h, and those triaged as minor urgencies were significantly more likely to refuse analgesia. Conversely, children with severe pain, acute pain (< 12 h), and those triaged as urgent cases were more likely to accept analgesia. The main reason for refusing analgesia was that the perceived pain intensity was not severe enough to warrant pharmacological intervention. There were no significant differences in the characteristics of caregivers who accepted or refused analgesia. Conclusions: This study found a high prevalence of pharmacological analgesia refusal in children presenting to the emergency department. Most refusals were due to the perception that the pain intensity was not severe enough to require pharmacological interventions. What is Known: • Pain is a primary reason for Emergency Department (ED) visits in children. • Analgesic refusal can be seen as a barrier to optimal pain management in this setting. • No European studies have explored the prevalence of analgesic refusal in children and the reasons for refusal. What is New: • This study found an 18.3% prevalence of analgesic refusal among children with moderate to severe pain. • Children's age, as well as the type and duration of pain, are variables associated with refusal. • Caregiver characteristics do not significantly influence the rate of refusal. • The primary reason for refusing analgesia was the perceived intensity of pain, supporting the notion that a simple numerical pain assessment may not accurately reflect a child's willingness to undergo pharmacological intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.