ArticleCommunications medicine2025
Decoding sexually dimorphic proteomic landscapes in the context of aging and mortality.
Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanistic redundancy and hierarchy of aging mechanisms: implications for strategies to extend healthspan and biomarker integration.Frontiers in aging · 2026Review
- The Roles of EDA2R in Ageing and Disease.Aging cell · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAging-associated changes are major contributors to the onset and progression of chronic diseases. Different aging clocks have been developed to assess biological aging, demonstrating their utility in predicting mortality, diagnosing disease, and evaluating the efficacy of antiaging interventions. However, the protein profile underlying the accelerating or decelerating rates of aging, hidden behind aging clocks, remains poorly understood.
methodBased on the UK Biobank (n = 53, 013; age range 39-71 years; 53.9% men and 46.1% women), we built a proteomic-based aging clock, ProteAge, and assessed its performance in predicting all-cause mortality. Sex-specific aging trajectories and aging rate-associated proteins (ARPs) were identified.
resultsProteAge reveals distinct aging trajectories for males and females, with females exhibiting more nonlinear changes in the aging rate than males do. We identify hundreds of accelerating and decelerating aging rate proteins (ARPs) in both sexes. Given the critical role of mortality prediction in aging and longevity research, we identify a subset of mortality-aging-associated proteins among ARPs, with a total of 1 protein in females but 172 in males. Furthermore, the protective and risk factors in both sexes are identified based on these ARPs.
conclusionsThese findings highlight sexually-dimorphic proteomic changes associated with aging and mortality, offering insights into the biological mechanisms underlying aging and longevity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.