Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41023384›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A prospective study of predictors of return to work after surgery for ulnar nerve entrapment.

Alice Giöstad, Kamil Piotr, Malin Zimmerman, Erika Nyman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alice GiöstadDivision of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. alice.giostad@ki.se.
Kamil PiotrDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Malin ZimmermanDepartment of Translational Medicine - Hand Surgery, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, 205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
Erika NymanDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow (UNE) is the second most common compression neuropathy in the upper limb. Immediate return-to-work (RTW) after surgery is seldom possible due to restrictions and recovery demands. We aimed to explore RTW after UNE surgery and investigate factors contributing to variations. A prospective study with patients undergoing primary UNE surgery was conducted. Treatment decisions were based on a novel five-grade clinical scale. In total, 65 patients (25 women and 40 men) with a mean age of 51 ± 16 years were included. Simple decompression was the predominant procedure (n = 57, 88%). Manual laborers (n = 28, 43%) had the longest sick leave (7 weeks, IQR [3]) within the working population (n = 49) compared to non-manual laborers (4 weeks, IQR [6]; p = 0.003). Manual labor, smoking, and preoperative pain (evaluated with the Swedish version of the Patient-Rated Ulnar Nerve Evaluation, PRUNE-S) predicted prolonged sick leave. The type of surgery did not predict RTW variations in the multivariate linear model itself but modified the impact of other predictors. In conclusion, patients with surgically treated UNE have varying sick leave needs, influenced by individual and work-related factors. Incorporating biopsychosocial aspects should be a focus of further research in UNE management.

Indexed as

Return to WorkUlnar Nerve Compression SyndromesAdultDecompression, SurgicalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSick LeaveUlnar Nerve

Identifiers

PMID41023384
PMCPMC12479791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.