ArticleScientific reports2025
Examining the factor's influencing IoT-blockchain based secure transmission services.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Smart Chemical Sensors for Monitoring and Detection of Spoilage in Fermented and Non-Fermented Food Products.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study addresses the critical challenge of ensuring secure data transmission and management in Internet of Things (IoT) systems by proposing a blockchain-based architectural framework. Traditional IoT security models often lack fine-grained architectural validation and user-centric evaluation, leading to gaps in trust, data integrity, and operational transparency. To overcome these limitations, the research introduces a novel framework that integrates Transmission Nodes, Inspection Nodes, Forwarding Nodes, and a Blockchain Security Service to secure sensor data from source to destination. The study employs a mixed-method approach, combining conceptual modeling with subjective evaluation from 32 domain experts across development, administration, and IoT service delivery sectors. Key findings indicate that components like the Blockchain Security Service and Transmission Node scored highly in terms of security effectiveness, data integrity, and reliability, while Inspection Nodes revealed varied perceptions, highlighting areas for improvement. The contributions of this study are fourfold: (1) introducing a user-informed performance assessment model for blockchain-based IoT architectures, (2) validating an operational case scenario using real-world transmission flows, (3) offering a detailed architectural breakdown with defined roles for each node, and (4) establishing a multi-metric evaluation framework incorporating integrity, latency, scalability, and privacy. The findings provide both theoretical and practical insights for enhancing trust and performance in decentralized IoT environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.