ArticleScientific reports2025
Prediction of damage evolution in carbonate building stones subjected to simulated acid rain using M5P model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study focuses on predicting the acid rain damage using machine learning techniques. First, a database containing 168 datasets was established based on laboratory experiments on seven types of carbonate building stones. Laboratory experiments were conducted at three different pH levels, using sulfuric acid (H₂SO₄) and nitric acid (HNO₃) to simulate acid rain conditions. Furthermore, during experiments, P-wave velocity was used to define the acid rain damage index (D). Then, to predict D efficiently and accurately, the M5 Prime (M5P) algorithm was employed as a white-box and interpretable machine learning technique. The predictive capability of developed M5P model was assessed by several performance assessment metrics. Based on obtained results, the suggested model predicted D with good accuracy and acceptable errors. The feature importance quantification results in M5P model demonstrated that stone's porosity is the most influential variable on acid rain damage. Finally, predictive capability of M5P model was compared with support vector regression (SVR) and random forest (RF) models. This comparison showed that the proposed M5P model outperforms other models in terms of D prediction accuracy, with a determination coefficient (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.