Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41023327›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Prediction of damage evolution in carbonate building stones subjected to simulated acid rain using M5P model.

Ali Bameri, Ebrahim Ghasemi, Mehdi Nasiri Sarvi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ali BameriDepartment of Mining Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, 8415683111, Iran.
Ebrahim GhasemiDepartment of Mining Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, 8415683111, Iran. e_ghasemi@iut.ac.ir.
Mehdi Nasiri SarviDepartment of Mining Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, 8415683111, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study focuses on predicting the acid rain damage using machine learning techniques. First, a database containing 168 datasets was established based on laboratory experiments on seven types of carbonate building stones. Laboratory experiments were conducted at three different pH levels, using sulfuric acid (H₂SO₄) and nitric acid (HNO₃) to simulate acid rain conditions. Furthermore, during experiments, P-wave velocity was used to define the acid rain damage index (D). Then, to predict D efficiently and accurately, the M5 Prime (M5P) algorithm was employed as a white-box and interpretable machine learning technique. The predictive capability of developed M5P model was assessed by several performance assessment metrics. Based on obtained results, the suggested model predicted D with good accuracy and acceptable errors. The feature importance quantification results in M5P model demonstrated that stone's porosity is the most influential variable on acid rain damage. Finally, predictive capability of M5P model was compared with support vector regression (SVR) and random forest (RF) models. This comparison showed that the proposed M5P model outperforms other models in terms of D prediction accuracy, with a determination coefficient (R

Indexed as

Acid rainCarbonate building stonesDamage predictionM5P modelMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID41023327
PMCPMC12480502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.