ArticleScientific reports2025
A novel two-step metabarcoding approach improves soil microbiome biodiversity assessment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The foundation of microbial ecology research is Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS), which allows for reconstruction of the soil microbiome taxonomical structure and the calculation of biodiversity metrics. However, obtaining reliable data on soil biodiversity poses several challenges, with accurate primer selection being one of the most critical. While 16S rDNA primers are widely used for their ability to broadly target bacterial communities, they can introduce biases. These primers may preferentially amplify certain bacterial groups, leading to a skewed representation of the microbial diversity in soil samples. To overcome the bias, we developed a novel, Two-Step Metabarcoding (TSM) approach to obtain more accurate and detailed data on soil microbiome structure and biodiversity. The first step involved sequencing of amplicons generated using universal 16S rDNA primers, provided an initial overview of the microbial community, and allowed the identification of key taxonomical groups. In the second step, we employed sequencing of amplicons generated with taxa-specific primers designed for the most abundant phyla in the community. We used the obtained data for a more reliable reconstruction of microbiome taxonomic structure and biodiversity. This two-step approach ensures a thorough exploration of the soil microbiome and promises to enhance our understanding of soil microbial dynamics and ecology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.