ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2025
[Video laryngoscopy in the intensive care unit-A current assessment].
Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Video laryngoscopy (VL) and direct laryngoscopy (DL) are both intubation methods used on the intensive care unit although it is unclear if the routine use of VL is meaningful in this setting. A systematic literature search was carried out up to April 2024 in the data banks MEDLINE, CENTRAL and LIVIVO. Included were studies in which a comparison between VL and DL in adult patients on the intensive care unit was carried out. The primary endpoint was determined as the rate of the first attempt success (FAS). The secondary endpoints were visualization of the glottis according to Cormack-Lehane, the time to intubation and complications. A total of 13 studies with 4232 intubations were included. The FAS was significantly higher for VL compared to DL (odds ratio, OR = 1.97, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.47-2.64, p < 0.001). The use of VL led to an improved visualization of the glottis according to Cormack-Lehane and was associated with a lower rate of esophageal intubation failure and hypoxemia. This resulted in tendencies for action for the future utilization of VL on the intensive care unit. Further studies should evaluate the experience of the user with intubation, various VL designs and the use of bougies and stylets to be able to make a better assessment of the routine use of VL on the intensive care unit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41023275What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.