Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41023234›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026

Utilization of Serratus Muscle-Fascia Flap to Ensure Implant Stability in Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction.

Mehmet Sağır, Erdem Güven, Onur Saylik, Emir Çapkınoğlu, Cihan Uras

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mehmet SağırSpecialist in Department of Plastic Surgery, Private Acıbadem Maslak Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey. mdmehmetsagir@gmail.com.
Erdem GüvenSpecialist in Department of Plastic Surgery, Private Acıbadem Maslak Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Onur SaylikDepartment of General Surgery, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Emir ÇapkınoğluResearch Institute of Senology, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Cihan UrasResearch Institute of Senology, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn prosthetic breast reconstruction, the thought on the placement of the implant has changed over the years. The aim of this study was to use the serratus muscle-fascia flap for prepectoral breast reconstruction with a permanent implant, performed simultaneously with mastectomy, in cases where mesh was not used. Essentially, the serratus muscle-fascia flap was used in prepectoral repairs to ensuring the implant is positioned where it should be. The goal here is to keep the prosthesis stable in the mastectomy pocket until the capsule forms.

methodsThis retrospective study included all patients who underwent prepectoral reconstruction using the serratus muscle-fascia flap between January 2023 and September 2024. This study consists only of patients who underwent surgery at the Acıbadem University Senology Institute. Two-stage reconstruction, delayed reconstruction, and breast reconstruction with autologous tissue were excluded from the study. The surgery was performed by Güven E and Sağır M from the plastic surgery team, and the mastectomy was performed by Uras C from the general surgery team. In the mastectomy pouch, the prosthesis was supported from the lateral and superolateral regions with serratus muscle-fascia flaps. The patients were evaluated for implant position at the end of the eighth week. They were also evaluated for early and late complications.

resultsThis study includes 57 patients and 70 breasts. Early complications were observed in 3 breasts, while late complications were observed in 9 breasts. At the 8-week postoperative follow-up, no lateral displacement of the implant was observed in any of the breasts, and all breast quadrants were formed. No full-thickness necrosis of the areola or skin flaps was observed in any of the breasts. In the late period, two breasts developed seroma. The most common complication was rippling with fat injection.

conclusionPrepectoral permanent implant reconstruction was performed without the use of mesh, reducing costs. In lateral incisions, in prepectoral reconstruction, the entire or part of the incision line is supported by vascularized tissue. The indication for prepectoral breast reconstruction has been expanded. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Breast ImplantationBreast ImplantsBreast NeoplasmsMammaplastySurgical FlapsAdultEstheticsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMastectomyMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBreast cancerBreast reconstructionNipple-sparing mastectomyPrepectoral reconstructionSerratus muscle-fascia flapSkin-sparing mastectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.