SynthesisAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Effects of Sphenopalatine Ganglion Nerve Block on Bleeding and Pain During and After Septorhinoplasty: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdministration of a sphenopalatine ganglion block using a local anesthetic has been proposed as a method to reduce bleeding and pain associated with septorhinoplasty, but definitive evidence to support this practice is lacking.
methodsRelevant studies were identified through systematic searches of PubMed, SCOPUS, Google Scholar, Embase, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. Five studies were included in the meta-analysis. In all of them, the outcomes of patients receiving perioperative SPGB (treatment group) were compared with those of patients receiving either a placebo or no intervention (control group). The primary outcomes in the present study were pain and bleeding, with quantitative data synthesized using standardized mean differences.
resultsPatients in the SPGB group had significantly less intraoperative pain, as evidenced by less remifentanil consumption, and required fewer postoperative analgesics than the control group. Postoperative pain scores were consistently lower in the SPGB group for up to 24 h. Mean arterial pressure during surgery was also better controlled in the treatment group. The quality of the surgical field was improved, as indicated by reduced bleeding and higher surgeon satisfaction. However, no differences emerged between groups in terms of operative time or lower or upper eyelid ecchymosis.
conclusionThe results of this meta-analysis support the use of SPGB with local anesthesia in septorhinoplasty to significantly reduce intraoperative and postoperative complications, particularly in terms of managing pain and bleeding. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41023232What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.