Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41023230›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026

A 20-Year Experience with Round Smooth Saline Breast Implant Explantation: Reasons, Trends, and Management.

Ted S Eisenberg, Julianne Pilla, George Chapa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ted S EisenbergDivision of Plastic Surgery, Nazareth Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA. drted10@comcast.net.ORCID 0000-0002-2992-2661
Julianne PillaDivision of General Surgery, Nazareth Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
George ChapaDivision of General Surgery, Nazareth Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent literature has identified a rising trend in breast implant explantation, frequently attributed to concerns about implant safety and long-term health risks. The purpose of this study is to analyze patient-reported reasons for explantation and to share the senior author's experience with implant removal and postoperative management over a 20 year period.

methodsA retrospective review was conducted of 4909 patients who underwent primary cosmetic breast augmentation between 2005 and 2024. Of these, 77 patients elected to undergo explantation. All explanted patients had round, smooth Mentor saline implants. Only four patients had their original augmentation performed by another surgeon. Post-explantation management included placement of two 6-inch compression bandages for one to three weeks, followed by aesthetic reassessment at an average of two months. Patient demographics-including age, height, weight, pregnancy history, implant size, tobacco use, and pertinent medical history-were recorded. Time from implantation to explantation and patient-reported reasons were also documented.

resultsA total of 77 patients underwent bilateral explantation, representing 1.57% of the 4909 augmentations performed by the senior author. The average duration from implantation to explantation was 12 years, and the average patient age at explantation was 43 years. The average implant volume was 413 cc. Between 2016 and 2024, there was a 382.9% increase in explantation procedures, consistent with global trends. The most common reason for explantation was weight gain and the perception of breasts being too large (n = 27, 35.06%), followed by implant deflation (n = 24, 31.17%). One patient underwent implant replacement with a smaller volume at 9 months, another opted for larger implants 5 years later, and one patient underwent mastopexy 3 months after explantation.

conclusionWhile the trend in breast implant explantation continues to rise, the findings in this study contrast with current literature citing implant safety concerns as the primary motivator. In this cohort, the most common reasons for removal were significant weight gain resulting in dissatisfaction with breast size, implant deflation, and a history of multiple prior cosmetic breast surgeries. Postoperative management with simple explantation and compression bandaging yielded satisfactory aesthetic outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors  www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Breast ImplantationBreast ImplantsDevice RemovalAdultCohort StudiesEstheticsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPostoperative ComplicationsProsthesis DesignReoperationRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsBreast implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL)Breast implant explantation trendsBreast implant illness (BII)Saline breast augmentationSaline breast implant deflation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.