Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2025
Is there a link between physical function testing and ventral hernia size?
Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Functional Status after Ventral Hernia Repair: Longitudinal Trends and the Limits of Improvement.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClinical assessments of physical function are widely used to evaluate candidacy and predict outcomes for various procedures. This study investigates the relationship between ventral hernia size and physical function tests.
methodsA cohort study was performed on prospectively collected data as part of a randomized control trial Pilot Trial of Abdominal Core Rehabilitation To Improve Outcomes After Ventral Hernia Repair (ABVENTURE-P). Patients scheduled for ventral hernia repair were enrolled between 4/2022 and 8/2024. Patients completed the Five Times Sit-to-Stand (5 × STS) and Timed Up & Go (TUG) physical functional tests pre-operatively. Hernia width was then measured at the time of hernia repair. Associations between hernia width and physical function tests were assessed using Spearman's rank correlation tests, and associations between European Hernia Society (EHS) classifications and physical function tests were assessed using one-way ANOVA.
resultsA total of 112 patients were evaluated with a mean hernia width of 7 cm (SD 7 cm), classified by EHS as 47% W1, 29% W2, and 24% W3. No significant association was found between 5 × STS scores and hernia size when analyzed as a continuous variable (Spearman's rho = 0.13, p = 0.19) or across EHS classifications (p = 0.12). Similarly, TUG scores showed no significant correlation with hernia size as a continuous variable (Spearman's rho = 0.13, p = 0.16) or across EHS classifications (p = 0.08).
conclusionPhysical function test scores alone did not correlate with ventral hernia size in this cohort. Hernia width was not significantly associated with 5 × STS or TUG performance when analyzed as a continuous variable by EHS classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.