ArticleScientific reports2025
Cognitive efficiency in VR simulated natural indoor environments examined through EEG and affective responses.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging Space Perception, Emotions, and Artificial Intelligence in Neuroarchitecture.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Immersive virtual reality as a novel approach to improve social cognition in multiple sclerosis: an EEG-based pilot study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the neurophysiological and affective responses elicited by nature-inspired indoor design elements, including curvilinear forms (CL), nature views (N), and wooden interiors (W), in a virtual environment, and their effects on cognitive performance. Thirty-six participants experienced one control and three experimental conditions in a within-subject design. Electroencephalography (EEG) was used to record neural activity, relaxation and valence ratings assessed affective states, and standardized tasks measured cognitive performance. The W condition elicited EEG patterns indicative of relaxed attentional engagement, including increased alpha-to-theta (ATR) and alpha-to-beta (ABR) ratios, and a decreased theta-to-beta (TBR) ratio. These neural patterns were associated with higher self-reported relaxation and positive affect, and with enhanced cognitive performance relative to the control condition. In contrast, the CL and N conditions did not improve cognitive performance, and the N condition showed elevated physiological arousal, likely due to heightened visual stimulation. Regression analysis identified ATR and relaxation as significant predictors of cognitive performance, emphasizing the role of emotional stability and neural balance in supporting task engagement. Overall, the findings highlight the potential of nature-inspired design to foster a synergy between psychological relaxation and cognitive attention, though further research is needed across diverse spatial typologies to isolate specific design parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.