ArticleScientific reports2025
Sexual dimorphism in zebrafish liver proteins and implications for hepatic regeneration and diseases.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preclinical modeling of Loeys-Dietz syndrome: insights into mechanisms and therapy.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Review
- Comparative Hepatotoxicity Assessment of PFOS and Its Alternative 6:2 FTSA in Adult Female Zebrafish.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The liver is a central metabolic hub, performing vital functions such as bile production, protein, carbohydrate, lipid and drug metabolism, detoxification of xenobiotics, and the synthesis of essential biomolecules for reproduction, and also shows regenerative capability. Several of these functions can be affected by sexual dimorphisms with important consequences. In this study we used high-throughput proteomics to identify and quantify proteins involved in sexual dimorphism of the zebrafish liver, as a model for preclinical human research. Additionally, we conducted an extensive literature review to explore potential effects of sex-biased protein abundances on liver regeneration capacity and hepatic diseases. The results showed wide-spread sex-specific differences in proteins involved in carbohydrate, protein, and lipid metabolism. Female livers exhibited higher levels of proteins involved in protein synthesis, while male liver protein abundances were higher in energy-producing biochemical pathways, such as the TCA, β-oxidation, and glycolysis. Furthermore, significant sex differences were observed in proteins related to drug metabolism, which should be considered in toxicological and pharmacological research. Some potential links between sex-biased quantities of some key hepatic proteins and the susceptibility of males to liver diseases, as well as the higher hepatic regenerative capacity in females, were suggested. These findings offer a foundation for future targeted research to facilitate the development of sex-specific therapeutic approaches for liver disorders and regenerative medicine. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD061886.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.